This page contains all relevant filings from both sides, Superior Court Orders, Appellate Opinions, Supreme Court Rulings and Verbatim Transcripts with Audio-Video links if available:
[Date of Action, Type of Action, Parties/Case number]
SCOTUS Filings
(2) SERVED CERTIORARI SCOTUS on 03/14/2025
(1) Extension of Time Granted by SCOTUS on 03/13/2025 (Noticed late)
(1) Motion for Extension of Time 03/10/2025
Filings and Rulings with North Carolina Supreme Court
YEAR 2024-25
(4) December 16, 2024 DENIAL RULING ON APPEAL BASED ON CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION WITHOUT REASONING
(3) October 31, 2024 APPEAL BASED ON CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTION
(2) October 24, 2024 DENIAL RULING ON WRIT OF MANDAMUS WITHOUT REASONING
(1) September 3, 2024 WRIT OF MANDAMUS
YEAR 2021-2024
()
()
Filings with North Carolina Court of Appeals
(9) Court dismissed the case on August 28, 2024
(8) Appellant filed objection on August 17, and 19, 2024
(7) Court granted this extension by violating Appellate rule within 20 minutes on August 16, 2024
(6) Appellee filed motion for the Extension of time on August 16, 2024
(5) In case #24CV0840-590 Brief filed on May 17, 2024 with Fee, Court Clerk DOCKETED on June 3, 2024
(4) Appellate court on December 22, 2021, dismissed all three Appeals of Das, #21-806 was arbitrarily stricken, #21-690 was reframed as a Breach of Contract case and dismissed, and main Appeal was dismissed alleging UNTIMELY ISSUANCE OF Notice of APPEAL
(3) Case #21-806 (Sabotaging Plaintiff Das from hearing by Court) docketed on November, ______2021
(2) Case #21-690 (Transcript Dispute) docketed on October ________2021
(1) Case #21-740 (Main Appeal) docketed on July ______2021
Filings with Superior Court of Mecklenburg, Charlotte, NC
(16) Hearing in case 2020CVS-10880-590 conducted by Judge George Bell on October 11, 2021. Here, Plaintiff Das representing himself was disconnected from remote hearing and the Judge hastily dismissed the case and later refused to rehear the case, Third Appealing invoked
(15) Judge Carla N. Archie dismissed the Motion despite Das describing the complaint about CRM, citing her 'lack of authority' to grant reviewing transcript; Second Appeal invoked
(14) Upon CRM David Jester's unsolicited suggestion through email Defendant Das filed the motion wrongly under criminal rule 15A12__D on July 13, 2021
(13) Court Transcriptionist refused Defendant Das's request to review the transcript on July 13, 2021
(12) Transcript served on July 1st, 2021 and was found doctored, missing facts, altered dialogues and witness testimony session truncated/deleted.
(11) Defendant Das signed the Contract with Court Transcriptionist on May 18, 2021, –paying $1420 for the truthful Verbatim hearing Transcript
(10) Notice of Appeal issued on May 12, 2021, DOCKET GRANTED #21-740 for processing Record on Appeal settlement with Plaintiff on June ____ 2021
(9) Court Served the order on May 5, 2021
(8) Judge Hoover denied the Motion to Rehear the case on March 25, 2021
(7) Landlord offered the return of property on October 8, 2020, Defendant DAS refused to accept to avoid contempt of Judge Hoover's order
(6) Defendant Das filed motion for rehearing through Attorney Eric Levine on October ______2020
(5) Judge on September 25, 2020 signed the order allowing Landlord to retain the possession of Defendant's business assets and ordered defendants to pay $155,000 for entire lease period rent with Attorney fee $20,000 by ignoring forfeiture of lease by the landlord through seizure of tenant's property.
(4) Kalishwar Das on August 20, 2020 sued Landlord John F, Morgan for stealing his business property and sabotaging his business income. Case was docketed as #2020CVS10880-590 with the same Mecklenburg Superior Court, Charlotte, NC
(3) Hearing held on August 17-18/2020 by Judge Donnie Hoover. Judge coerced upon Defendant DAS to forget property loss to mitigate Sheriff's failure in arranging the return of his property after eviction, ignored witness testimony of Property Manager of Plaintiff' lying on record and discriminated against defendant DAS representing himself. His company Vibha Mens Clothing LLC had no counterclaim after landlord already had forfeited his lease to demand rent so, was not represented.
(2) * Mediation Report conducted by Attorney Benjamin on __________ 2020
(1) Landlord filed complain for collection of Rent on August 19, 2019 in Superior Court of Mecklenburg, Charlotte docketed as #19CVS16728-590 against Vibha Mens Clothing LLC and Kalishwar Das for being lease guarantor. Plaintiff deliberately ignored the matter of property seizure forfeiting their lease and committed fraud on court.
Magistrate Court of Mecklenburg, Charlotte, NC
(1)
Magistrate Court of Mecklenburg, Charlotte, NC
Filings with Bar Association/Administrative Tribunals/Chief Justice
(1)
Federal Filings
(3) 3:24CV595-FDW ____________2024
(2) 3:23CV514-FDW September 2023
(1) 3:22CV561-FDW October 22, 2022
<<< BACK